|
TWPT:
You've spoken about your academic writing, lets take a look at your
latest book Daughters of the Goddess. When was it that you decided to
begin collecting the material that eventually made up this book?
Did you have some goals in mind that you wanted
to achieve as you edited this material into the book?
How did you go about choosing the voices that
would be heard via the authors that appear in this book?
The book is divided into two parts, Part 1 is
the research and Part 2 is the teachings, tell me about why you used
this division.
As you worked through all the authors and their
submissions were there threads of similarities shared by all concerned?
How did your own beliefs play a role in the
final shape and form of this book?
What kinds of feedback and reactions have you
had to the book since it was published?
I hear tell that you play a mean frame drum and
are just a tad irreverent, care to tell me a little bit about that
side of your personality? <g>
Ultimately isn't it better if your spiritual
path can be one of laughter and fun as well as worship and ritual?
Any final thoughts or wisdom you would like to
share with our readers before we close this out?
WG: When I first began writing on Goddess
Spirituality, I planned on publishing a series of articles and then
turning them into a book. That is fairly standard
operating procedure in academia, because you can turn out articles
faster than a book and you can "mine" your research quickly
in order to have enough publications for tenure and promotion.
But the anthology, Daughters of the Goddess, grew in an entirely
different way. I sent out two proposals to publishers, one for a book
woven together from my research papers and another for an anthology
of chapters by a variety of American scholars who were doing research
in this area. The second proposal was what caught the
publisher's eye, especially since I suggested including a few
chapters by women who taught Goddess Spirituality and were not
academics. The idea in this was to explore different ways of knowing.
When the publisher called me with a contract, I was on sabbatical at
the London School of Economics and Political Science. It was a
dream sabbatical; I was spending my time following Druids through the
woods, doing ritual with Witches in stone circles in Scotland and in
the mountains in Wales, camping out in the New Forest, and
interviewing women who had been instrumental in shaping the British
Goddess Movement. As soon as I got the offer, I knew I had to
include British scholars and their research as well.
Fortunately, I had made some wonderful contacts and immediately asked
a few of my new colleagues to participate.
By that time, I had been awarded tenure, so the goal of the book
wasn't quite as instrumental as it might have been otherwise.
Tenure also allowed me to be comfortable about being a bit more
open. Earlier, concerns had been raised in our respective
departments when Tanice and I published that we had played "spin
the Goddess" in a Jacuzzi with naked lesbian Witches as part of
a Beltane ritual. With Daughters.., I wanted to
demonstrate how wide-spread Goddess Spirituality is, how it meets
spiritual needs and the challenge it offers to patriarchal
structures. I know pagans don't like the word
"religion," but as a sociologist I would argue that Goddess
Spirituality functions like a religion does in creating community and
providing a framework of meaning for significant life events,
and teaching us our relationship to the rest of the universe, only
with much more flexibility and less dogma and hierarchy. I
hoped the book would help nonpagans understand that it is as
legitimate as any other spiritual tradition. And I hoped that
feminists who dismiss Goddess Spirituality, would see its potential
for radical social change.
I know almost all the chapter authors, some through professional
work, some are personal friends. Almost all of them practice or
have practiced some form of Goddess Spirituality. I posted a call for
chapters on a list serve and contacted everyone I knew who was doing
this kind of research. I would have liked to have more
chapters than I had, but the pool of academic scholars who study this
particular aspect of the phenomenon and use the kind of rigorous
methodology I wanted is still fairly small. I love the fact that so
many pagan graduate students are doing this work. I expect a
wonderful proliferation of scholarly publications in the very near
future from all different academic disciplines.
I divided the book into two sections called research and
teachings. This was very important to me because, even though
some of the researchers also teach Goddess Spirituality, their
academic training allows them to explore it differently than the
teachers who are not academics. It is almost like
language. You may be bilingual, but there are some words and
concepts that derive from your culture and simply don't translate
easily. I also intended the book for classroom use, and I
wanted to stimulate a discussion about different ways of knowing and
understanding. The section on teachings represented in part the
explosion of women's art that coincided with the birth of the Goddess
Movement. I selected the three teacher/practitioners because 1)
they all stress experiential, bodily knowing yet teach different
aspects of Goddess Spirituality, 2) among them, they have influenced
literally thousands of women, 3) they are all amazing artists, they
both write and do, and 4) the three women are personal friends of mine.
I had originally planned to arrange the chapters around four themes:
women's bodies, women's bonds, women's history and women's
power. But projects take on a life of their own. Once the
chapters came in, it was clear that the patterns weaving through the
writings were healing, identity and empowerment, not the ones I had
selected. I threw out the index cards I'd been using to organize my
thoughts and started all over again. The new themes became the
subtitle of the book. It was really rather wonderful, because
it forced me to open up and listen carefully to the voices of the
other authors.
One of the challenges of academic publishing (besides the lack of
money) is the lack of publicity. The publishers typically
include every book in a catalog of all their publications that goes
out to other academics once a year. They don't have the kind of
budget that publishers in the trade or commercial press do. So they
usually don't advertise individual books and they print in limited
numbers, which is also why they are expensive. They don't even print
the cover in full color, a disappointment to me, as the painting that
was used was originally done in full glorious color by my sister, Gay
Riseborough. Because of these constraints, Daughters of the
Goddess hasn't gotten the amount of publicity I would have liked, but
I understood that it wouldn't going in. That means there hasn't
been a tremendous amount of feedback about the book. Most of what
I've gotten has been favorable, although some academics believe
I'm not critical enough, that the book is too positive and
ignores a dark underbelly.
On the other hand, some pagans don't understand why I don't
self-reveal more and why I take an analytical stance in the first
place. But just today I received an e-mail from a man I
met once at a university event, who wrote, "I particularly like
the ecumenical manner in which you use Gaian in your essay in
Daughters of the Goddess, which I'm re-reading for the second time
this week. It's a wonderful book." As I also received your
question about feedback to the book today, I'll consider that another
one of those lovely coincidences.
When I told my sister about this interview, she warned me to let my
real self show through. According to her, sometimes I get so
serious and academic that its hard to recognize me. (Some of my
academic colleagues, on the other hand, would probably say that
sometimes I'm not serious or deep enough!) My sister said
I should talk about the years before I got a Ph.D. when I was a
puppeteer, a diamond courier, an Off-Broadway actress, a folk singer,
a Tarot reader, a romance novelist and a bartender. All
true. I was even a Beat poet for a while in Greenwich Village,
but I looked so young they wouldn't let me read my own poetry in public.
When I started back to school, I was a single parent with only one
quarter of college to my credit. I really had to settle down
and channel all this creative energy into my studies. I felt
like I had to ignore the creative, playful, irreverent parts of my
personality. I wasn't totally successful in this, I might add,
but I was fairly narrowly focused for many years. One of the
wonderful things about my life today is that I feel I am an
integrated whole; my choice of research topic has helped revive those
denied aspects of myself. I am a serious scholar and an
artist. I publish my research and present at academic meetings,
and I write poetry, compose music and am a founding member of a
women's frame drum performance group called Lipushau that uses
rhythm, spoken word, music and movement to create a link between the
mythic past and the mythic present. How blessed can one woman be?
TWPT:
Thanks so much for talking to us Wendy and I wish you the greatest of
success with both your academic and your writing career. Blessings to you. |